Creating a Training Feedback Loop

Underrated leadership lesson: Be radically transparent. Feedback shouldn't happen just once a year. It should be a daily, continuous loop. During my 10 years at Bridgewater, I received 12,385 pieces of feedback. And, it wasn't just reserved for formal reviews. Feedback was given LIVE throughout the day. In the middle of a presentation? Feedback. Right after answering a question? Feedback. Truthfully, as an employee, I didn't always love it. But I valued it. After all, they're called blind spots for a reason. This was all the result of one key principle: Radical transparency. A system that integrates candid feedback into daily work life, Allowing employees to constantly assess and be assessed. Here's why it works: ✅ Good thinking and behavior increase ↳ Processes improve when logic is analyzed in real time. ✅ High standards are maintained  ↳ Problems get fixed faster when everything is visible. ✅ No more workplace hierarchies ↳ Continuous improvement happens when everyone is accountable. It's a principle that didn't just change my resilience to feedback. It completely transformed my leadership as a whole. So managers, Consider implementing radical transparency for these 7 reasons: 1. Faster problem-solving ↳ Small issues are easier to fix than big ones. 2. Openness saves time ↳ Less time wasted on gossip and tracking information. 3. Accelerated learning  ↳ Teams grow faster when they understand each other’s thinking. 4. Long-term success ↳ Ongoing feedback improves leadership and the organization. 5. Building an idea of meritocracy ↳ Transparency builds trust and rewards good ideas. 6. Reduced workplace inefficiencies ↳ Open communication cuts wasted time and confusion. 7. Proactive issue resolution ↳ Fixing small problems early prevents bigger ones. While getting scores live in the mid-presentation may not be for everyone: Becoming more transparent has real, tangible benefits, And can put you on a streamlined path to success. Leaders - are you brave enough to try it? ♻️ Repost to help other leaders become radically transparent. 🔔 And follow Dave Kline for more. 

I stopped treating feedback like criticism and started treating it like free consulting. Because feedback isn’t about your worth. It’s about your blind spots. Most people waste feedback. They get defensive. They explain themselves. They ignore it. And then they wonder why nothing changes. ✅ How to treat feedback like free consulting (the real playbook): 1️⃣ Stop waiting for annual reviews. If you only hear feedback once a year, you’re already behind. Create your own feedback loop monthly, even weekly. 2️⃣ Ask sharper questions. Don’t ask “How am I doing?” Ask “What’s one thing I could do that would change the way you see me as a leader?” 3️⃣ Separate emotion from data. Feedback stings. That’s normal. But behind the sting is data. Extract it, use it, move forward. 4️⃣ Interrogate the source. Not all feedback is equal. Filter advice through one lens: Has this person achieved what I want to achieve? 5️⃣ Demand specifics. “Be more strategic” is useless. Push for examples. What did you say? What should you have said instead? Feedback without examples is noise. 6️⃣ Look for patterns, not one-offs. One person’s opinion is bias. Three people saying the same thing is truth. Patterns reveal where you need to act. 7️⃣ Stop explaining. The moment you start justifying, you close the door to honesty. Take it in, say thank you, move on. 8️⃣ Test it in real time. Don’t just collect notes. Try the new behaviour in your next meeting, pitch, or email. Feedback without testing is just theory. 9️⃣ Keep receipts. Document feedback and your response to it. When it’s time for promotion, you show the growth curve — not just claim it. 🔟 Flip the mirror. Give feedback as much as you take it. The best way to sharpen your own lens is to hold one up for someone else. We call it “feedback.” The unprepared call it “criticism.” The ambitious call it “an edge.” What’s the most valuable piece of feedback you ever received?

Not too long ago, I worked with a team leader who thought leadership training was a one-time fix.  They believed attending a couple of workshops would instantly transform their team into high-performers. However, the reality hit hard when they realized that the results faded as quickly as the excitement from the last seminar.  The team didn’t change because the leadership habits didn’t stick. We shifted focus to continuous, behavior-driven learning, integrating feedback loops, ongoing coaching, and self-reflection into their day-to-day operations. The ROI? Sustained improvement in leadership effectiveness, team engagement, and measurable performance gains. Leadership development is an ongoing journey, not a single event. How are you ensuring that L&D becomes a continuous, evolving journey and not just a "one-off" event? #leadership #culture #mindset #inspiration #lead   

When Good Training Fails: A Neuroscience Wake-Up Call I will never forget walking into that tech company’s sleek office. Awards lined the lobby, the energy was palpable. Their HR director welcomed me with a familiar mix of enthusiasm and frustration. "We have done everything," she said. "Leadership programmes, feedback training, even brought in the high-profile consultants. Our managers nod along, take notes… and then nothing changes." I smiled. I had heard this before. This was not a training issue. It was a brilliant team stuck in the oldest trap in organisational development: assuming that knowing better automatically leads to doing better. When I spoke with their team leaders, the real story emerged: - I know I should give more feedback, but by Thursday, I am drowning - It feels awkward to bring it up. - I tried, but it felt forced. Then one engineering lead said something I will never forget: "You are teaching us to swim, then dropping us back in the desert and wondering why we are not practising." This was not about willpower. The environment was not designed to support the behaviour. So we changed that. +  We embedded 7-minute "connection checkpoints" into Monday meetings. + Placed simple "feedback cards" on desks. + Blocked out sacred time in calendars labelled "Team Investment Time". + Created peer accountability with one powerful weekly question: + "What conversation did you have that made someone stronger?" Months later, I received a video of a wall filled with anonymous notes of meaningful feedback. 😊 One note simply read: "For the first time, I feel seen here." 💙 Behaviour change is not about what we teach. It is about what people return to. Our brains need environments that make the right behaviours the easy ones. 🧠 So I will leave you with this: What behaviour are you trying to change in your organisation? And what have you done to redesign the environment to support it? Start with what matters. Use neuroscience to uncover the barriers. Then reimagine and reinforce the environment around the behaviour. Because we cannot expect people to change if everything around them stays the same. 💡

Your brain can't process praise and criticism simultaneously. That's why traditional feedback methods are harmful. But there's ONE discovery that creates growth, not resistance: Direct. Then Connect. Neuroscience shows our brains process praise and criticism through completely different neural pathways. That's why the "feedback sandwich" fails so spectacularly. When we buffer criticism with praise... The brain cannot process these mixed signals effectively. People see through it anyway. Studies show 74% of professionals detect sandwich feedback within seconds. Having directly managed 300+ people and coached over 100 founders on leadership and culture, I’ve seen the real impact of feedback. Here’s what works... Two simple steps: 1. DIRECT: First, get permission and deliver unfiltered feedback. "May I share some observations about your presentation?" Then state exactly what needs improvement. This activates voluntary participation, and increases receptivity greatly. 2. CONNECT: Then, separately reaffirm their value "Your contributions remain vital to our success." The key? Complete separation between these steps. Direct feedback gives a clean signal about what needs to change. Connection maintains psychological safety. They know their status isn't threatened. Getting permission isn’t a minor detail - it’s crucial. It fosters respect and trust before you give tough feedback. Setting the stage for it to land well. The neuroscience behind this is clear: A Gallup study shows regular feedback mechanisms result in 14.9% increase in employee engagement and a 21% increase in profitability. Companies implementing this see remarkable results: • Cisco saw 54% faster resolution of team conflicts • Adobe reported 30% reduction in employee turnover • Pixar found 22% higher willingness to challenge assumptions • Microsoft under Nadella accelerated deployment cycles by 31% The traditional sandwich approach can feel safer, but it creates distrust. Direct Then Connect can feel scarier, but it builds psychological safety. Humans are wired to prioritize belonging above almost everything. When feedback threatens our status, our brains go into protection mode. When feedback becomes clear and non-threatening, learning accelerates. Implementing this approach requires courage. You have to trust your relationship is strong enough to handle direct feedback. But that's the paradox: By being more direct, you actually build stronger relationships. Try it with your team this week. You might feel uncomfortable at first, but watch what happens to your culture. When feedback becomes clear and non-threatening, learning accelerates. And companies that learn faster win. - If you liked this post? Follow us for more insights on conscious leadership and building companies from the inside out. Proud to coach with Inside-Out Leadership: executive coaching by trained coaches who have founded, funded, scaled, & sold their own companies.

Ensuring Students Act on Feedback Feedback is only as valuable as the action students take in response to it. Too often, feedback becomes a passive exchange,teachers give comments, students glance at them, and then move on to the next task without making meaningful improvements. To truly accelerate progress, we need to create structures that ensure feedback leads to independent development. Here’s how: 1. Build Dedicated Feedback Lessons into Your Scheme of Work If feedback is to be effective, there must be time for students to engage with it properly. This means moving beyond a quick ‘read your comments’ approach and embedding dedicated feedback lessons into the scheme of work. By protecting this time within the curriculum, feedback becomes a continuous, structured process rather than an afterthought. 2. Use Targeted and Specific Feedback Vague comments like ‘be more analytical’ or ‘develop your explanation’ don’t give students a clear direction. Instead, feedback should be precise and actionable. For example: • Before: ‘Your analysis is weak.’ • After: ‘To strengthen your analysis, explain why this event was significant and link it to a wider consequence.’ Or Pose questions to help students develop their answer or guide them to the correct knowledge. Pairing feedback with examples or sentence starters can help students apply improvements more effectively. 3. Teach Students How to Use Feedback Students need to be explicitly taught how to engage with feedback. This includes: • Modelling the process – Show students how to act on feedback by walking them through a worked example. • Guiding self-reflection – Use prompts like, ‘How does my answer compare to the model? Where can I improve?’ • Encouraging peer support – Structured peer review can help students identify strengths and areas for development before teacher intervention. I often like to highlight a weak paragraph in a green box so students know what area to precisely improve/re-write, as you can see below. 4. Use Feedback Trackers to Monitor Progress Instead of feedback disappearing into exercise books, encourage students to keep a feedback tracker where they record teacher comments and their own reflections. They can then set targets for the next piece of work and review previous feedback to ensure they’re improving over time. Feedback is most powerful when it becomes part of the learning process, not just an add-on. By allocating time in the curriculum for feedback lessons, making guidance explicit, and encouraging students to take ownership, we can transform feedback from words on a page into meaningful improvement. The ultimate goal? Students who no longer just receive feedback, but actively use it to progress.

Harsh truth: Most managers give feedback at exactly the wrong time. And it's costing you engagement, retention, and results. Here's what research shows: • Morning feedback is 25% more effective • Midweek feedback gets 40% better implementation • Regular feedback boosts engagement by 31% When I implement feedback systems in organizations, we use process confirmation: ↳ One process review monthly ↳ Clear documentation of correct execution ↳ Systematic improvement tracking The science-backed framework: ↳ Schedule feedback before lunch (peak brain receptivity) ↳ Target Tuesday-Thursday (avoid Monday blues) ↳ Keep specific issues to 5-10 minutes ↳ Document improvements systematically ↳ Follow up within 7 days This prevents the classic "waiting for annual review" problem. Instead, managers confirm processes regularly, catch issues early, and build trust through consistency. Start tomorrow: 1. Block 30 minutes before lunch for your next feedback session 2. Create a simple tracking template 3. Schedule one process review with each team member What's your biggest challenge with giving feedback? Reply below ⬇️ ___ 👋 Hi, I'm Sharon Grossman! I help organizations reduce turnover. ♻️ Repost to support your network. 🔔 Follow me for leadership, burnout, and retention strategies

96% of employees value regular feedback. Yet only 30% receive it consistently. In leading teams and coaching managers, I see this trip leaders up all the time. Most feedback fails. Because: • It comes too late • It’s too vague • It feels like an attack If you want better team feedback, make it a system, not an event. Here’s how: 1. Use the SBI Framework – Situation → Behavior → Impact keeps feedback clear and grounded. 2. The 48-Hour Rule – Timely feedback feels more caring and lands better. 3. Power Questions for Your 1:1s – Ask things like “What could I have done better today?” to build trust. 4. Make Feedback Normal – Build it into team rituals like retros and pulse checks. 5. Lead by Example – Share your own feedback and growth moments first. 6. Avoid These Feedback Traps – Don’t be vague, only negative, or skip follow-up. Consistent feedback builds trust. And trust builds high-performing teams. 💾 Save this guide for your next 1:1. ♻️ Reshare to help others give better feedback. ➕ Follow me, Melody Olson, for Leadership & Career Insights.

"How can I build a feedback system that gives me actual results?" - I received this question recently and realized that a lot of 1st-time CEOs face this confusion. Building a motivated and high-performing team starts with a feedback system that works! But first, we need to understand that feedback isn’t just about collecting opinions. It’s about leveraging insights to: - Inspire growth - Drive engagement - Achieve superior results ⁉️ One of the biggest challenges for new leaders? Balancing team management with motivation. This is where A robust feedback system comes in. It can be the cornerstone of a successful performance management strategy. But how do you design one that delivers tangible results? Here's something from my personal experience 👇 As an employee, I focused on: ✔️ Striving to meet my manager’s expectations. ✔️ Prioritizing tasks over organizational goals. ✔️ Delivering top-notch results. As a CEO, my focus shifted to: ↳ Coaching my team to grow professionally. ↳ Emphasizing the human side of leadership. ↳ Understanding the root causes behind performance dips. ↳ Reinforcing that progress is a shared responsibility, with employees playing an active role. ↳ Offering positive, actionable feedback that highlights strengths while addressing challenges. There's a difference. Here are a few insights from Industry Leaders 💡 McKinsey’s 2024 global survey highlights: - Skilled managers and structured systems are essential for motivating employees. - Tying goals to individual and team objectives boosts engagement. - Professional growth opportunities are more motivating than financial rewards alone. 💡 Harvard Business Review emphasizes: - Use tools to analyze feedback effectively. - Let employees know how their feedback drives change. - Frame feedback as a pathway to improvement, not criticism. Remember, effective leadership isn’t about micromanaging tasks—it’s about empowering your team with meaningful feedback and strategic performance management. By creating a structured feedback system, you don’t just improve performance—you foster trust, engagement, and growth. #feedback #roadmap #leadership #CEO How are you integrating employee feedback into your performance management strategy? Share your tips and experiences below—let’s grow as leaders together!