Archive for Texas

Nature on mirror conferences

Posted in Books, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 28, 2026 by xi'an

In a news article entitled “Scientists skip key US meetings — and seize on smaller alternatives”, Nature discusses the impact of the restrictive policies put in place by the Trump administration on US conferences and their attendance. Including the multiplication of mirror and satellite meetings. One of the examples in the article is Neurips 2025,

“…the artificial-intelligence conference NeurIPS hosted not only its main meeting in San Diego, California, but also its first-ever alternative location, in Mexico City, with the goal of alleviating travel challenges (…) in response to “skyrocketing attendance and difficulties in obtaining travel visas some attendees have experienced in the past few years when only one location was available” [while] a group of AI researchers in Europe organized an independent spin-off conference, dubbed EurIPS, in Copenhagen (…) owing to concerns including climate change [and people expressing] a desire for a less hostile environment”

With a limited number of 500 participants attending in Mexico. And a massive number in Copenhagen, over 2,000! With a final quote from Emtiyaz Khan (a plenary speaker at ISBA 2026):

[I] chose to travel to EurIPS rather than NeurIPS because of the difficulties many others faced in getting into the United States. The smaller nature of EurIPS made it much easier to meet and interact with other scientists. I absolutely loved it and I would love to see it happen again.”

This state of affairs is not going to vanish with Trump adding more countries to the banned country list, 75 at this stage!, and this is a call to arms for ISBA and IMS conference organisers towards planning for multi-hub configurations, since such international organisations cannot exclude a third of the countries in the World from attending their conferences. Which makes our current ISBA survey all the more relevant! I am currently building a mirror meeting for BayesComp 2027 in Aussois, French Alps. For those who cannot or do not wish to travel to Texas for the main conference.

abortion bans increased fertility rates and infant deaths (through a Bayesian analysis)

Posted in Books, Kids, Statistics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 26, 2025 by xi'an

“fertility rates in states with abortion bans were higher than would have been expected in the absence of these policies, with the largest estimated differences among subpopulations experiencing the greatest structural disadvantages and in states with among the worst maternal and child health and well-being outcomes” Bell, Frank & al., JAMA, 13 Feb 2025

“The groups that are most likely to have children as a result of abortion bans are also individuals who are most likely, for a number of different reasons, to have higher rates of infant mortality,” THYT, 13 Feb 2025

“Infant mortality in Texas was 9.4 percent higher after abortion bans were implemented than would have been expected” THYT, 13 Feb 2025

“Evidence suggests that increases in the fertility rate due to abortion bans were especially large among people who experienced structural disadvantage, including racially minoritized individuals, those without a college degree, and individuals using public health insurance3—all groups with higher infant mortality rates.” Gemmil, Frank & al., JAMA, 13 Feb 2025

Waco, indeed… [my body, your choice]

Posted in Books, Kids, Travel with tags , , , , , , , , , on December 25, 2022 by xi'an

Just read a terrible story in The New York Time Magazine about a pregnant Texan teenager with absentee parents being denied abortion (in the Roe vs. Wade past era) by a Waco judge on the basis that “she was not mature enough to make that decision”… Leading to the irrational conclusion that she was deemed to be mature enough to raise children since she was to continue her pregnancy till delivery. Unsurprisingly, the story does not end up well.

“The question of “maturity” is open to wildly different interpretations, particularly when assessed by a judge who answers to voters (…)The maturity test was not about a teenager’s ability to weigh the benefits and risks of her medical choice.”

 

systemic realities?!

Posted in Books, Kids with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 16, 2022 by xi'an

While the US Supreme Court has all but abolished Roe v. Wade, by allowing Texas to keep banning abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy, The New York Times continues to publish opinion pieces from anti-abortion editors. Like this one this weekend from an Anglican priest who can make preachifying statements like Roe v. Wade creating “realities where abortion becomes the easier choice for women who have unintended pregnancies” or where “pressure from the medical community to abort is common”… Or yet stating that “many European countries have far more restrictive abortion laws and lower abortion rates than the United States without curtailing the advancement of women.” As analysed in another NYT article,  this is also an argument made by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ill-boding for the future of the law. This is when solely considering the cutoff of Roe v. Wade, rather than the access to abortion which proves much more inaccessible in most US States than Western Europe countries (with the exceptions of Northern Ireland, the Faroe Islands, and Malta, plus Poland), from local regulations to financial hurdles, to inexistent offer. (And I wonder at the repeated use of realities in the tribune. There is one reality and it is pretty harsh on women seeking abortion. Unless one prefers alternative facts…)

and it only gets worse

Posted in Books, Kids, Travel with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on September 15, 2021 by xi'an

“The law, known as Senate Bill 8, amounts to a nearly complete ban on abortion in Texas, one that will further fuel legal and political battles over the future of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion. The law makes no exceptions for pregnancies resulting from incest or rape.” NYT, Sept. 1

“The [Supreme] Court’s order is stunning,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent. “Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand.” NYT, Sept. 2

“A judge in Ohio ordered a hospital to treat a Covid-19 patient with ivermectin, despite warnings from experts that the anti-parasitic drug has not proved effective against the virus and can be dangerous in large doses.” The Guardian, Aug. 31

“More than half of the world’s people have no social protections, the United Nations has warned, even after the pandemic pushed many governments to offer services to their populations.” The Guardian, Sept. 1